Live Stream

Do States Make Their Own Voting Laws

Sweeping federal legislation would set national standards to combat many new state laws aimed at suppressing voters and sabotaging valid election results. The power of states and Congress to regulate elections to Congress under the election clause is subject to express and implied limits. In principle, neither entity can enact laws under the electoral clause that violate other constitutional provisions. For example, the Constitution states that anyone authorized to vote for the largest house in a state legislature can also vote for the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate. The election clause does not allow states or Congress to override these provisions by establishing additional qualifications to vote for Congress. In Arizona, voters who are considered “inactive,” meaning they do not vote by mail in two consecutive election cycles and do not respond to a sender within 90 days, are removed from the state`s permanent early election list and no longer automatically receive ballots each cycle. Opponents of the law say about 150,000 people in Arizona will be deported as a result.

Congress hereby notes that the imposition and enforcement of the residency requirement of duration as a condition of voting for the positions of President and Vice President, and the lack of sufficient opportunities for absentee balloting and absentee voting in presidential elections – the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 – have approved federal election funding. He also established the United States Electoral Assistance Commission (EAC). The EAC helps states comply with HAVA to adopt minimum standards for voter education, registration and voting. During the same period, eligible lawmakers are pushing back, trying to expand access to the election and build on the momentum that led to the highest turnout in more than a century in 2020. So far, four states have enacted five laws that expand the right to vote. In total, at least 596 bills with expansive provisions in 44 state legislatures have been proposed. Access to postal voting. More than a third of expansive bills passed by state legislatures (19 bills in nine states and Washington, D.C.) focus on expanding absentee voting.

footnote40_wgfrndu 40 CA A.B. 2815, DC C.B. 507, MA H. 76, MA P. 2554, MD H.B. 862, MD S.B. 163, MI H.B. 4839, NC H.B. 782, NY A.B. 1084, NY A.B. 4128, NY S.B.

253, NY S.B. 492, OK H.B. 1711, OK H.B. 1843, PA H.B. 1800, RI H.B. 7100, RI H.B. 7831, RI H.B. 7832, RI S.B. 2007 The Bills would expand the use of absentee ballot boxes, create or extend an unhonored mail-in ballot, require election officers to send requests to all eligible electors, require prepaid postage on absentee voting envelopes, and allow electors to automatically receive absentee ballots for all elections. For the purposes of this Section, it is not established that a State or a political subdivision has used tests or devices for the purpose or effect of denying or shortening the right to vote on the basis of race or colour or in violation of the safeguards set out in subsection (f) (2) if (1) incidents of such use have been rare and prompt and effective by the State or local action; (2) the ongoing effects of such incidents have been eliminated and (3) there is no reasonable likelihood that they will recur in the future.

The states are: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Congress hereby instructs the Director of the Census to immediately conduct a survey to compile registration and election statistics: (i) in any state or political subdivision for which the prohibitions in Section 10303(a) of this Title are in effect, for any national general election for members of the United States House of Representatives after January 1, 1974; and (ii) in any state or political subdivision for an election determined by the U.S. Civil Rights Commission. These surveys include only a census of citizens of voting age, race or colour and national origin and the extent to which these individuals are registered to vote and participated in the elections surveyed. Nevertheless, the structure of electoral administration in today`s states is still largely decentralized and contains many variations, although much less than a century ago. Table 2 shows the names of offices involved in electoral administration in States with shared responsibilities. The states that still require it are Oklahoma, Alaska and Alabama. Last spring, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey (right) signed into law a series of anti-election laws that restricted access to policies that helped Arizona voters participate in the 2020 election, namely mail-in voting, with which about 86 percent of Arizona voters voted in the 2020 election. The state also made headlines for launching a partisan and conspiracy investigation into the results of Arizona`s 2020 election results led by a private company whose founder made pro-Trump statements.

In the end, and not surprisingly, the review found no evidence of fraud. But it still helped fuel unfounded suspicions about the findings and even prompted other states, including Texas, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, to conduct similar “investigations.” The Court also held that a legislature may delegate its powers to other bodies or officials in accordance with the electoral clause. Some states have chosen to transfer the power to transfer congressional district boundaries from their respective legislatures to bipartisan or bipartisan “independent redistribution commissions.” These states believe that such commissions can make the electoral process fairer by preventing voters from being divided into congressional districts in order to improperly protect existing incumbents (“gerrymandering”). Between January 1 and May 4, six states (Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky and Oklahoma) passed nine election interference laws.