The Latin sequestrare, abolish or abandon, a late usage, derives from sequester, a guardian or trustee in whose hands a contentious matter has been placed until the dispute is settled; it was a concept of Roman jurisprudence (cf. Digest L. 16, 110). By derivation, it must be connected to Sequio to be able to track; It is possible that development can be successor, companion, intermediary, that is, fiduciary. In English, “sequestered” simply means isolated, withdrawn. [1] The sheriff, as long as he retains possession of the forfeited property, is required to care for and administer it if it is of such a nature that he is admitted as a prudent family man who manages his own affairs. He may entrust them to the care of guardians or supervisors, whose acts he remains responsible, and he is entitled to a fair indemnity for his administration, which shall be determined by the court and paid to him out of the proceeds of the seized property, if a decision is rendered in favour of the plaintiff. In international law, the term sequestration means seizure. Typically, this means the appropriation of private property for public use.
After war, kidnapping means confiscating the property of private individuals of an enemy power, as when a belligerent nation confiscates the debts of its own subjects from the enemy. v. to keep separate or separate. In so-called “high-profile” criminal cases (involving serious crimes, events or individuals made available to the general public), jurors are sometimes “locked up” in a hotel without access to the media, the public or their families, except under supervision to prevent the jury from being “tainted” with information or opinions about the trial outside of evidence in the courtroom. A witness may be excluded from the hearing of other witnesses, which is commonly referred to as “excluded” until he or she has testified, ostensibly to prevent that witness from being influenced by other evidence or to tailor his or her testimony to the accounts of others. In this case, the word sequestration does not mean judicial filing, since sequestration can coexist with administrative law, whereas mere filing does not. The court may, of its own motion, order the seizure of immovable property in a dispute if the ownership of the property is disputed and one of the parties to the dispute does not appear to have a more obvious right of possession than the other. In these cases, it may be ordered that the seizure continue until the question of ownership has been decided. Our editors will review what you have submitted and decide if the article needs to be revised. All types of property, whether real or personal, and the resulting income may be confiscated.
Bonds and titles may also be forfeited if their ownership is disputed. Other definitions of sequestration refer to property. In civil law, receivership has three different meanings. First, it means renouncing or rejecting the estate, as if a widow were appearing in court and refusing any interest in the estate of her deceased husband; The widow is supposed to be sequestered. Second, it means removing something that is controversial from the possession of the disputing parties and placing it in the hands of a third party; This neutral part is called escrow. Thirdly, and most often, seizure of property in civil law refers to the act of seizure of property by court order. 3. Segregation of jurors or witnesses during the trial to maintain fairness during the trial.
Juries may be accommodated in hotels to avoid the influence of persons who are not present at the trial. Similarly, witnesses can be isolated from each other to ensure that they testify only from what they have personally observed. A defendant against whom a warrant of receivership has been obtained may, except in case of default, cause it to be cancelled by fulfilling his obligation in favour of the sheriff of good and solvent security, whatever amount the judge determines is equal to the value of the property to be left in his possession. Jury sequestration is rare. False imprisonment, which is usually ordered in high-profile criminal cases, begins immediately after jury composition and continues until the jury reaches its verdict. It is rare for juries to be staffed for more than a few days or a week. Sometimes, however, jurors are locked up for weeks. The trial of former football star O. J.
(Orenthal James) Simpson for murder in 1995 was highly unusual: the Simpson jury was suspended for eight and a half months — half as long as Simpson in custody and in court. The experiment provoked protests from jurors and calls for legal reform. To separate. Sometimes juries are isolated from outside influences during their deliberations.6 min spent reading SEQUESTRATION, Louisiana practice. The Louisiana Code of Civil Practice defines and includes the following provisions on forcible confinement. 269. A seizure is a warrant from the court which, in certain cases, orders the sheriff to take possession of his thing and to keep an object in the possession of another person until a proceeding has been decided so that it may be returned to the person who is deemed to have the right to have the property or possession of the thing. This is rightly called a judicial seizure. See 1 R. Mart.
79; 1 R. S. 439; Civil Code of Lo. 2941; 2948. 2.-Article 270. In this case, the word sequestration does not mean judicial filing, since sequestration can coexist with administrative law, whereas mere filing does not. 3.-Article 271. All types of property, whether real or personal, and the resulting income may be confiscated.
4.-272 Bonds and securities may also be seized if their ownership is disputed. 5.-Article 273. Judicial seizure is normally ordered only at the request of one of the parties to a dispute; However, there are cases where it is issued by the Court of Justice without such a request or is the consequence of the execution of judgments. 6.-Article 274. The court may, of its own motion, order the seizure of immovable property in a dispute if the ownership of the property is disputed and one of the parties to the dispute does not appear to have a more obvious right of possession than the other. In these cases, it may be ordered that the seizure continue until the question of ownership has been decided. 7.-Article 275. Seizure may be ordered at the request of one of the parties to the dispute in the following cases: 1. If a person in possession for more than one year has been forcibly evicted and brings legal proceedings for the return of his possession.